Paul Erlich > The Xenharmonic Alliance (2011-02-06)
"projective tuning space" "based on" "{2,3,9}"
numerals at "ETs" represent steps per '2'
hexagons are "contours" of "maximum Tenney-weighted damage" of "TOP tunings"
this one is not like the others! 9/3 is considered a different interval than 3, with complexity log(27) rather than log(3), and susceptibility to damage 1/log(27) instead of 1/log(3) -- whatever that means!
Table of Contents
In the following images, unless otherwise specified:
5-limit
from A Middle Path
projective tuning space based on {2,3,5}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
zoomed waaaay out
zoomed-out still more
zoomed-out more
zoomed-out
5-limit projective tuning space showing equal temperaments and good rank-two temperaments (or "temperament families"). Concentric hexagons indicate TOP damage (of TOP tuning) up to 10 in increments of 1.
zoomed-in
zoomed-in more
zoomed-in still more
zoomed way in
zoomed way way in
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 0
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 1
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 2
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 3
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 4
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 5
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 6
showing all three elements of each 5-limit breed
zoom level 7
11-limit subgroups
projective tuning space based on {2,3,7}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,3,7}
zoomed way out!
"projective tuning space" "based on" "{2,3,9}"
numerals at "ETs" represent steps per '2'
hexagons are "contours" of "maximum Tenney-weighted damage" of "TOP tunings"
this one is not like the others! 9/3 is considered a different interval than 3, with complexity log(27) rather than log(3), and susceptibility to damage 1/log(27) instead of 1/log(3) -- whatever that means!
projective tuning space based on {2,3,11}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,5,7}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,5,9}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,5,11}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,7,9}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,7,11}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
projective tuning space based on {2,9,11}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '2'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings
3.5.7, tritave (3-1) based
projective tuning space based on {3,5,7}
numerals at ETs represent steps per '3'
hexagons are contours of maximum Tenney-weighted damage of TOP tunings